Why the 49ers didn’t trade for Commanders DT Daron Payne

Washington Commanders perspective

The Washington Commanders had been fielding calls from opposing teams about their stalwart defensive tackle, and it’s sensible why they’d do so, given the contract the team issued to Jonathan Allen, as well as the overwhelming young talent along that defensive line.

Payne, 25, is on the last year of his rookie contract and is scheduled to hit unrestricted free agency at the end of the season, so the Commanders could’ve looked to move him for some future assets if they felt an extension was improbable.

However, the 49ers didn’t have significant draft capital available, as they’d already traded away both their first and second-round selections in the 2023 NFL Draft in the Trey Lance and Christian McCaffrey trades, respectively.

As a result, if the Commanders were seeking a second-round pick, the 49ers would’ve been forced to move only a 2024 selection, which isn’t as feasible as believed.

Commanders general manager Martin Mayhew could be considered on the hot seat over the next two seasons, given the poor performance of his team, and he may not see the light of the 2024 draft. It wouldn’t necessarily make sense to acquire assets too far into the future without assurances of job security. Payne helps the team compete now, especially in light of their improved play as of late, which likely made it difficult for Mayhew to feel motivated to move him without a significant return, which the 49ers could not offer.

San Francisco 49ers perspective

The San Francisco 49ers obviously would have welcomed the talent of Daron Payne to their roster, as they’ve faced issues along the interior of their defensive line due to injury, forcing them to give zig i any snaps to backup-level players.

Payne wouldn’t have been just a move for 2022, but likely would’ve been a long-term investment, especially given the necessary capital required to obtain his services.

However, the 49ers are already paying defensive lineman Arik Armstead significant money, while Nick Bosa is expected to negotiate a massive extension at the end of the season, making San Francisco potentially on the hook for three big-money contracts for a position group that is already the most expensive on the team.

The alternative could be moving on from Armstead at the end of the season and keeping Payne as the face of the interior as he enters his prime. However, Armstead’s contract would trigger a dead cap hit of over $21 million for the 2022 season should he be traded or released, limiting the 49ers financially as they try and bring back several key cogs in the offseason.

To sum up, the financials of a trade for Payne would’ve been extremely tricky for the 49ers, making it tougher to facilitate the trade on top of the compensation issues.

While Payne would’ve undoubtedly been a huge addition for the roster in 2022, especially if defensive tackle Javon Kinlaw does not return for the remainder of the season, it’s understandable from both ends why a trade wasn’t made.